Skip to content
← Back to the whole case

Sentence 5 · elDiario.es · 27 August 2026

“El Supremo condena a Cofidis por incluir en el fichero de morosos a una mujer que impugnó por usura un crédito”

What the outlet published · Sentence 5

“[N]o consta que Cofidis diera respuesta a la reclamación ni que promoviera actuación alguna para verificar si la controversia había llegado a judicializarse, limitándose a mantener la validez del contrato y a requerir el pago de las cantidades que consideraba debidas.”

Translation · ES
[T]here is no record that Cofidis answered the claim or took any step to check whether the dispute had reached the courts, confining itself to maintaining that the contract was valid and demanding payment of the sums it considered owed.

What this claims, in our words

THE OMISSION ALLEGED: no answer to the customer's claim and no check on whether the dispute was already before a court. Cofidis can rebut this with its own correspondence file.

What the other side says

Outlet ahead▸ Not yet checked
share#5

Share this sentence

Post on XWhatsAppLinkedInEmail

Sharing sends the sentence, not our opinion of it: whoever opens it reads both columns.

See the other sentences in this case →