elDiario.es
· 27 August 2026 · Carlos del Castillo
“Dos horas diarias, dinero condicionado y Europa fuera: qué implica el pacto por el diseño adictivo de Instagram y Facebook”
About
The settlement between Meta and 47 US states over the addictive design of Instagram and Facebook: the figures, what is conditional, and what Meta concedes. The right-hand column is open for Meta to reply.
How it ended, sentence by sentence
The outlet
5
5 unanswered
The accused
0
- 5 still standing: unanswered, or the outlet was right
Article score: 10.0/10
Every sentence starts counting for the article, because unanswered is how it was published. Answering it takes the point off the outlet and gives it to the person named. Green means answered, not proven: what an editor has checked against a document is written in each sentence's own label.
What the outlet published
What the other side says
What the outlet published · Sentence 1
“Meta, la matriz de Facebook e Instagram, ha llegado a un acuerdo extrajudicial con 47 estados de EEUU para cerrar el mayor juicio hasta la fecha sobre el diseño adictivo de sus apps y su impacto negativo en adolescentes.”
Translation · ES
Meta, the parent of Facebook and Instagram, has reached an out-of-court settlement with 47 US states to close the largest case to date on the addictive design of its apps and their negative impact on teenagers.
What this claims, in our words
THE SETTLEMENT AND ITS SCOPE: 47 states, and the subject named as the addictive design of the apps. Both the number and the characterisation are checkable against the filed agreement.
What the outlet published · Sentence 2
“La multinacional pagará hasta 18.000 millones de dólares en la próxima década e introducirá límites de uso para los menores, aunque ha conseguido esquivar el reconocimiento de haber actuado de forma irregular.”
Translation · ES
The multinational will pay up to 18 billion dollars over the next decade and will introduce usage limits for minors, although it has managed to avoid any admission of wrongdoing.
What this claims, in our words
THE HEADLINE FIGURE: up to 18 billion dollars, plus usage limits, with no admission of wrongdoing. "Up to" is doing work here, and the next sentence explains why.
What the outlet published · Sentence 3
“Según ha comunicado la multinacional, Meta se compromete a un pago garantizado de 12.700 millones de dólares a lo largo de diez años, con diferentes cuantías para cada uno de los estados que han aceptado el acuerdo.”
Translation · ES
According to the multinational's own announcement, Meta commits to a guaranteed payment of 12.7 billion dollars over ten years, with different amounts for each of the states that accepted the agreement.
What this claims, in our words
WHAT IS ACTUALLY GUARANTEED: 12.7 billion, not 18. Attributed to Meta's own statement, so the company is the source of this figure.
What the outlet published · Sentence 4
“Los 5.300 millones de dólares restantes solo se activarán si YouTube y TikTok, contra las que los fiscales han abierto procesos equivalentes al de Meta, aceptan pagos y medidas equivalentes a las que se ha comprometido la empresa de Mark Zuckerberg.”
Translation · ES
The remaining 5.3 billion dollars will only be triggered if YouTube and TikTok, against which prosecutors have opened cases equivalent to Meta's, accept payments and measures equivalent to those the company owned by Mark Zuckerberg has committed to.
What this claims, in our words
THE CONDITION: 5.3 billion depends on what two rival companies do. It is the difference between the figure in the headlines and the money Meta has actually committed.
What the outlet published · Sentence 5
“Meta ha negado haber cometido cualquier irregularidad durante todo el proceso.”
Translation · ES
Meta has denied committing any wrongdoing throughout the process.
What this claims, in our words
META'S POSITION, AS THE ARTICLE CARRIES IT: a flat denial of wrongdoing. Recorded so the company's existing version is on the page from the start.
Is this about you?
The right-hand column is yours, sentence by sentence. Nobody edits what you write, and nobody else can fill it in for you. First prove you are who you say you are — a document check that takes two minutes, a work email, or paperwork a person on our team reads.
Your reply is published unedited and next to the sentence it answers. We do not shorten it and we do not comment on it.
Published unedited and sealed with a timestamp. A reply can be corrected later; every earlier version stays public.
Share this case
Sharing sends the case, not our opinion of it: whoever opens it reads both columns.